Default Logic and purity of reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Gianni Amati
  • Luigia Carlucci Aiello
  • Fiora Pirri
  • Ugo Bordoni
چکیده

Foreword Ray Reiter has worked out Default Logic during his sabbatical leave in 1979, at Imperial College in London. The paper on Default Logic then appeared in the landmark issue of the Artificial Intelligence Journal on " Commonsense Reasoning " [1]. A vast literature flourished from Ray's initial proposal, and after 20 years, it is still studied and used in many fields of Artificial Intelligence. Default Logic is one of the inventions of AI that will still be celebrated in the future. The secret of the success of Default Logic is in its ability to represent a good deal of the dynamics of reasoning, yet giving it the status of a logic. It has become paradigmatic for the evergreen challenge: how close can logic come to meet reasoning; how far can reasoning go to reach the abstract and formal sky of logic. Even more: Default Logic has challenged scientists interested in purity of reasoning, those interested in the mechanical and al-gorithmic nature of proofs that handle exceptions, and those interested in the logical foundations of cognitive agents. Default Logic has disclosed them both the possibility of making explicit aspects that were implicit or hidden in the initial formulation, and provided them the intuition to make a big step towards the formalization and mechanization of reasoning. We worked on Default Logic from 1989 till 1996. We are among those who believe in purity of reasoning. That is, reasoning mechanisms can be given a formal and symbolic apparatus independent of the instrument or tool that will make it work. This view allowed us to understand an important pattern that links the different forms of commonsense reasoning, i.e. the implicit and explicit contextual definability. We here briefly report our recent results on the logic of defaults, and dedicate them to Ray on his 60th birthday.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Axiomatization of Credulous Reasoning in Rational Default Logic

Nonmonotonic reasoning is succesfully formalized by the class of default logics. In this paper we introduce an axiomatic system for credulous reasoning in rational default logic. Based on classical sequent calculus and anti-sequent calculus, an abstract characterization of credulous nonmonotonic default inference in this variant of default logic is presented.

متن کامل

Two-phase Exception Logic

In this paper we propose an exception logic { formalizing reasoning about exceptions. We use this logic to defend two claims. First, we argue that default logic { formalizing reasoning about default assumptions { is an extension of exception logic. A deconstruction argument shows that reasoning about exceptions is one of the rst principles of reasoning about default assumptions. Second, we argu...

متن کامل

Meta Level Reasoning and Default Reasoning

In this paper, we propose a logic framework for meta level reasoning as well as default reasoning in a general sense, based on an arbitrary underlying logic. In this framework, meta level reasoning is the task of how to deduce new meta level rules by giving a set of rules, whilst default reasoning is the problem of what are the possible candidate beliefs by giving them. We define the semantics ...

متن کامل

Reasoning About Exceptions?

In this paper we propose an exception logic – formalizing reasoning about exceptions. We use this logic to defend two claims. First, we argue that default logic – formalizing reasoning about default assumptions – is an extension of exception logic. A deconstruction argument shows that reasoning about exceptions is one of the first principles of reasoning about default assumptions. Second, we ar...

متن کامل

Representing Autoepistemic Introspection in Terms of Default Rules

This paper addresses the relationship of Reiter's default logic, Moore's autoepistemic logic as well as Marek and Truszczyyski's strong autoepis-temic logic from a new point of view. Earlier research results on their in-terconnection support the view that default reasoning is a special case of autoepistemic reasoning. To the contrary, this paper shows how autoepis-temic theories can be faithful...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007